Archive for Marian Literature

The Mother of God through the Eyes of the Mystics

Regardless of the qualitative nature of the Marian Scripture, very little is comparatively revealed about her life. The mystical tradition highlights and expounds on this life by adding greater clarity and depth. Four mystics, each in a special manner, highlight the life of the Blessed Virgin. These mystics are St. Bridget of Sweden, Bl. Anne Catherine Emmerich, Ven. Maria de Agreda and Maria Valtorta. Some have had the sanctity of their lives recognized by the Church and others reflect a saintly reputation. The Scriptural events are: the Annunciation, the Visitation, the Nativity, and the Passion of Jesus, with a focus on the time of death and the role of the Blessed Mother. This article will discuss the Scriptural events and then provide a consensus of material from the aforementioned mystical authors which enliven the Scriptural events.

Further, all similarities between the mystics will be identified and any disagreements will be noted and discussed as well. The revelation studied here does not add to the sacred deposit; the sacred deposit is the public revelation of God and it is full and final. The revelation does, however, enrich the experience of the sacred texts. Each mystic reflects a different aspect of the Blessed Virgin’s life in the chosen five events. They highlight portions of each of the same events and relay details that enrich different areas conversely. Through their private revelation these mystics deepen the impact of the Blessed Virgin’s life in the lives of the faithful.

St. Bridget, who was born in 1303 in Sweden, is best known for the fifteen rosary promises (1). Accompanying these promises were revelations of the lives of Jesus and Mary. She was the daughter of a knight and governor (2). Her mother almost died before birth, but she survived and was told that she was saved because of the child in her womb (3). St. Bridget received her first heavenly vision when she was seven. She was offered a “precious crown” by a “beautiful lady” (4). Her father chose a husband for her at age 13. Bridget did not want marriage but out of obedience to God she obeyed her father (5). They lived chastely together for a couple of years as an offering for holy children (6). One of her children was St. Katherine of Sweden (7). After her husband’s death, she received more visions from God. During these visions she received messages from God for people and instructions to found a religious order (8). In addition, she was given a mission from God to bring the Pope from Avignon back to Rome (9).

Bl. Anne Catherine Emmerich is best known for the use of her Dolorous Passion of the Christ for the film the Passion of Christ. However, her writings are far more extensive. She was born in 1774 in West Germany (10). In 1803 she became an Augustinian nun (11). Her early years were especially filled with mystical experiences and extraordinary events; these experiences included understanding liturgical Latin the first time she attended Mass (12). During her last years she was very ill and survived by partaking solely in the Eucharist and water (13). She also possessed the stigmata (14). Her visions and works were all recorded by Clemens Bretano, who devoted a great portion of his later life to recording these visions (15). Her revelations were very extensive and covered the entire lives of Jesus, Mary and some of the saints. Her writings have received an imprimatur.

Ven. Maria de Agreda received extensive private revelation of the life of the Blessed Virgin Mary. She was a Spanish nun born in 1602 (16). It was recorded that she made a vow of chastity at only eight years old (17). She and her mother entered a Franciscan convent together, where she served for most of her life as Mother Superior (18). She received a dictate in a vision to write on the life of Blessed Mother at the age of 35. Her writings were prohibited for a short period of time (19). However, her writings have now received an approbation. The Mystical City of God was first approved by the local bishop; secondly it was passed by the inquisition of Spain; the third approval came from theologians of all religious bodies: Carmelites, Benedictines, Dominicans, and Jesuits; fourth, the approval of the then highly esteemed universities was given; and finally the approbate of Pope Innocent XI and Pope Benedict XIII was granted for the text (20). Her writings also have an imprimatur.

Lastly, Maria Valtorta, an Italian woman received seven volumes of revelation on the life of the Blessed Virgin Mary. She was born in 1897 in Italy where she was her parents’ only child. Her mother sought to control much of her daughter’s life and many of her actions were met by criticism (21). Her father was meek and docile and did little to counter the actions of his wife (22). Her mother twice terminated love interests, one of whom was her fiancé (23). Later Maria Valtorta was attacked on the street and became bedridden for months (24). She joined Catholic Action because she was seeking to serve the Lord (25). Maria then decided to take a vow of poverty, chastity and obedience because she wanted to be a ‘victim for Jesus’ (26). She became ill and was confined to suffer out of love of God. After the perspective deaths of her parents, she completed her autobiography and wrote in different capacities for 10 years (27). During this time she wrote over 15,000 pages (28). Upon her death her right hand, “the pen of the Lord,” appeared brighter and healthier than her left and her knees retorted to a bent position, which was the position in which she wrote (29). Her works received a temporary stay on the prohibited reading list (30).

http://www.motherofallpeoples.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1396&Itemid=40

Comments

The Peace of God Mirrored in the Admirable Heart of Mary

By St. John Eudes     

The peace of God is another divine perfection completely realizing its faithful image in the admirable Heart of the most holy Mother of God. But before studying the reflection, let us gaze at the original and consider this adorable perfection of the peace of God Himself.

What is the peace of God? It is a divine perfection consisting, according to St. Dionysius, in the ineffable union of God with Himself (1).

God is unutterably united with Himself, first of all, by His incomprehensible love for His Divine Self. Secondly, by His infinite sanctity, which raises Him immeasurably above anything that could affect His peace, if this could ever be affected. Thirdly, by His admirable simplicity, which renders all His perfections one single united perfection, which is the equivalent of the divine essence itself.

Fourthly, the infinite peace of God is maintained by the union which reigns between the eternal Persons, who share one spirit, one heart, one will, one purpose, one power, one wisdom, one goodness, and the same essence. This essence is eternal, impassible, invariable; hence nothing that happens in heaven, earth or hell can ever trouble its peace. God’s peace is God Himself, who is ever tranquil and unutterable. He is the first and sovereign principle of peace and entertains an unspeakable horror of all discord and division. He sent His only Son, the Prince of Peace, into the world to extinguish all our enmities with His Precious Blood, “killing the enmities in himself” (Eph 2:16), to reconcile us to His Heavenly Father, as well as to our brethren and to ourselves, and to be Himself our peace: “For He is our peace” (Eph 2:14). Our Savior accomplished this by destroying sin, the only source of division, and pacifying all creatures in heaven and on earth: “He made peace through the blood of his cross, both as to the things that are on earth, and the things that are in heaven” (Col 1:20). Such is the peace of God which St. Justus called the silence of God (2).

Now this adorable peace of God has impressed an excellent image of itself on the Heart of the Mother of Peace. In the first place, sin, the sole enemy of peace and the only cause of discord, never possessed the slightest power over the most holy Heart of Mary.

Secondly, divine grace, which always reigned within her Heart, kept the passions, senses, and all other faculties of the body and soul of the Mother of Grace under the rule of reason and the laws of God’s spirit.

Thirdly, the most profound humility of Mary’s Heart endowed her with a passionate love of suffering and humiliation, and enabled her to endure them in peacefulness.

Fourthly, the extraordinary love of her admirable Heart for holy poverty induced her to bear with equanimity the sorrows and discomforts which invariably accompany it.

In the fifth place, her ardent love of the Cross made her find refreshment even in trials and tribulations. In the sixth place, the invincible patience which strengthened her in the troubles, tempests and changes of our miserable earthly life, gave her complete possession of the most profound peace.

In the seventh place, the inconceivable charity towards mankind, which filled her gentle Heart, allowed no sentiment of aversion of enmity to sway her, even towards those who betrayed, sold and crucified her dearly beloved Son. Nay more, she herself offered Christ to the Eternal Father in expiation of their crime, and to re-establish an everlasting peace between God and man. That is why the Holy Spirit inspires her to say that she “found the precious treasure of peace that man had lost through sin” (Song 8:10). In the eighth place, her virginal Heart never having followed any will but the will of God, she always possessed God’s own peace in a most eminent degree.

Finally, divine peace so completely filled and permeated this peaceful Heart that it became a haven of peace and a source of tranquility for all who, troubled and shaken by the storm of adversity, passion and temptation, have recourse to her incomparable benignity with humility and confidence. O Queen of Peace, grant that our hearts may bear an image of the holy peace that reigns in thine!

This article was excerpted from St. John Eudes, The Admirable Heart of Mary, Part Five, Chapter VI. St. John Eudes is a spiritual father of the Order of the Sacred and Immaculate Hearts of Jesus and Mary, a contemplative community of lay and religious dedicated to serving the Hearts of Jesus and Mary through Eucharistic Adoration, contemplation, and corporal works of mercy. For more information on the order, visit www.heartsofjesusandmary.org.

Notes

(1) De ipsa divina pace…quomodo Deus quiescat in se et intra se sit, et totus secum sit supra quam unitus…neque cogitare ulli eorum qui sunt fas est, neque possible. De divin. Nominibus. Cap. II, I.

(2) Cf. Pachymyer. Paraphras, sancti Dionysii: Migni, Patrol, gr. latine tant.edita, tom. 2, p. 579.

MARIAN CONSECRATION
I, (name), a faithless sinner, renew and ratify today in your hands, O Immaculate Mother, the vows of my Baptism; I renounce forever Satan, his pomps and works; and I give myself entirely to Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Wisdom, to carry my cross after Him all the days of my life, and to be more faithful to Him than I have ever been before.
In the presence of all the heavenly court, I choose you this day for my Mother and Queen. I deliver and consecrate to you, as your slave, my body and soul, my goods, both interior and exterior, and even the value of all my good actions, past, present, and future; leaving to you the entire and full right of disposing of me, and all that belongs to me, without exception, according to your good pleasure, for the greater glory of God, in time and eternity. Amen.
– St. Louis Marie de Montfort

John Eudes was born at Ri, Normandy, France, on November 14, 1601, the son of a farmer. He went to the Jesuit college at Caen when he was 14, and despite his parents’ wish that he marry, joined the Congregation of the Oratory of France in 1623. He studied at Paris and at Aubervilliers, was ordained in 1625, and worked as a volunteer, caring for the victims of the plagues that struck Normandy in 1625 and 1631, and spent the next decade giving Missions, building a reputation as an outstanding preacher and confessor and for his opposition to Jansenism. He became interested in helping fallen women, and in 1641, with Madeleine Lamy, founded a refuge for them in Caen under the direction of the Visitandines. He resigned from the Oratorians in 1643 and founded the Congregation of Jesus and Mary (the Eudists) at Caen, composed of secular priests not bound by vows but dedicated to upgrading the clergy by establishing effective seminaries and to preaching missions. His foundation was opposed by the Oratorians and the Jansenists, and he was unable to obtain Papal approval for it, but in 1650, the Bishop of Coutances invited him to establish a seminary in that diocese. The same year the sisters at his refuge in Caen left the Visitandines and were recognized by the Bishop of Bayeux as a new congregation under the name of Sisters of Our Lady of Charity of the Refuge.

John founded seminaries at Lisieux in 1653 and Rouen in 1659 and was unsuccessful in another attempt to secure Papal approval of his congregation, but in 1666 the Refuge sisters received Pope Alexander III’s approval as an institute to reclaim and care for penitent wayward women. John continued giving missions and established new seminaries at Evreux in 1666 and Rennes in 1670. He shared with St. Mary Margaret Alacoque the honor of initiating devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus (he composed the Mass for the Sacred Heart in 1668) and the Holy Heart of Mary, popularizing the devotions with his “The Devotion to the Adorable Heart of Jesus” (1670) and “The Admirable Heart of the Most Holy Mother of God”, which he finished a month before his death at Caen on August 19th. He was canonized in 1925. His feast day is August 19th.

Comments

An Immaculate Offering in the Temple

When Our Lady revealed to Sr. Lucia the five greatest offenses against her Immaculate Heart, I have to believe she was being a typical mother to us by not drawing attention to the countless other sufferings she endures. Even within each of the five offenses are hundreds of distinct ways in which the world turns their hearts and minds from her.

In order to make some reparation for these little swords, and in honor of her Immaculate Heart, I thought it only appropriate to reply to an argument against her sinless nature:

If Mary was without sin, why did she make a sin offering at the temple in Luke 2:22-24? (1)

Mary made a sin offering at the temple because she, like Christ, was born under the law (Gal 4:4). In his Summa Theologiae, St. Thomas Aquinas explained that Christ submitted to the burdens of the law, like circumcision, even though he had no need of it. By doing so, he gave an example of humility and obedience, while approving the law and avoiding undue criticism, as he did elsewhere (Mt 17:27). Aquinas adds that these were

the same reasons He wished His Mother also to fulfill the prescriptions of the Law, to which, nevertheless, she was not subject…. Although the Blessed Virgin had no uncleanness, yet she wished to fulfill the observance of purification, not because she needed it, but on account of the precept of the Law. Thus the Evangelist says pointedly that the days of her purification “according to the Law” were accomplished; for she needed no purification in herself. (2)

Aquinas goes on to explain that the rites and ceremonies of the Old Testament did not cleanse a person from sin, since that is only possible through grace. However, these old signs foreshadowed the sacraments of the New Covenant, which do effect sanctification. The old rites were able to cleanse people, but only from a certain irregularity or bodily uncleanness that inhibited divine worship according to the law. Hebrews 9:13 explains, “The blood of goats and bulls and the sprinkling of a heifer’s ashes can sanctify those who are defiled so that their flesh is cleansed.” Since it was the body that was the subject of Mary’s “sin offering,” it is not correct to impute her soul with sin.

The forty days of ritual impurity, followed by the sin offering for a mother, were not because she committed a sin. After all, giving birth is not immoral. In the same way, according to Mosaic law a woman had to present a sin offering if her period was longer than normal (Lev 15:19-30). One could not imply from this that she was any more of a sinner than any other woman. The same could be said for the sin offerings needed to ceremonially cleanse one from leprosy (Lev. 14:20). At times sin offerings were offered as atonements for breaking the moral law, but they served many other purposes within the Mosaic tradition. So, the fact that Mary followed a ceremonial Old Testament law as it pertained to childbirth does not mean that she was a sinner.

Lastly, it could be pointed out that in Leviticus the law said, “when the days of her purification shall have been accomplished,” but when Luke mentions the same law, he writes, “When the days were completed for their purification” (Lev 12:6; Lk 2:22). This does not seem to be a reference to Joseph and Mary, since the father does not incur any impurity through childbirth, and so was not in need of ritual purification. Men incurred uncleanness through intercourse, but they would be cleansed from that within the same day (Lev 15:18). Obviously this would not have applied to Joseph, and even in normal cases of fatherhood, the husband is not required to present a sin offering forty days after the birth of the child. Only the mother is required to do this. The only thing the couple would do together is pay for the ransom of the firstborn, but this is not considered a purification for them.

The reference to “their purification” more likely refers to the purification of Mary and the child Jesus. But why would the purest members of the human race be in need of purification?

The purification and presentation of Jesus meant that he was ransomed for five silver shekels by Joseph and Mary. Like all firstborn children, Jesus was set apart and consecrated to God (Ex 13:2). For the Jews, the payment from the parents to the priest symbolized that the parents were buying the child back from God. However, the law did not require that the firstborn be presented at the temple, since the law could be fulfilled by simply paying a priest (Num 18:15-16). Neither did the law require the mother to be purified at the temple.

Luke does not explain why the trip was made to the temple, although some suggest this fulfills the prophecy in Malachi 3:1, which reads, “And suddenly there will come to the temple the Lord who you seek.” Whatever their reasons, it seems that Luke combines the purification of the mother with the ransom of the son in one act, stressing the presentation of Christ. It should not be overlooked that portions of Luke’s gospel came from Mary, and so this was likely her report of the events.

Lastly, and perhaps most convincingly, if Mary’s sin offering proves that she had sinned, then the fact that Jesus received a baptism of repentance in the Jordan should all the more impute guilt to Christ, which of course it does not. Therefore, if the gospel can speak of Christ being purified, Mary’s holiness cannot be called into question merely because she was purified.

By delving deeper into God’s Word, we can help our non-Catholic friends to see that Mary’s sinlessness does not contradict Scripture or detract from God’s glory. On the contrary, the Bible teaches us that the beauty of her soul is entirely the work of His hands.

Jason Evert, a Catholic apologist with Catholic Answers, holds a Graduate degree in theology from Franciscan University of Steubenville. He specializes in the Catholic Church’s teaching on chastity, giving seminars and talks to thousands of young people each year.

Notes

(1) Cf. Lev 12:1-8.

(2) Summa Theologiae, III, 37, 4.

http://www.motherofallpeoples.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1187&Itemid=83

Comments

« Previous entries · Next entries »